InsideCX · Episode 1 of 5
NPS Burnout Pt. 1 — “I’ve got enough numbers.”
There was a certain tension in the room. Twelve people around the table, including the CMO …
What it's about, and what sticks.
- Presentation to the head of marketing. Six months of customer data, carefully prepared, everything ready.
- After the first slide, she stops me: “Tell me what we're doing differently tomorrow. I've got enough numbers.” The data was correct. It just didn't help her.
- The mistake was in the question before that. We had measured how satisfied customers were. What she needed to know was which customer interactions bring value, and which ones cost it.
There was a certain tension in the room. Twelve people around the table, including the CMO and several of her direct reports. On the agenda: the results of the semiannual relational customer survey. Along with satisfaction scores across several dozen touchpoints along the customer journey. And the Customer Effort Score (CES), which we often jokingly call the “friction index.” It shows how much effort customers have to put in to get their issue resolved. We had prepared everything carefully. The analysis was solid. The visualizations were clear. I was convinced we had something to say. Then the first slide came up. And before I could say my first sentence, the CMO leaned back and said: “Please just tell me what we’re doing differently tomorrow. What’s your plan, and how will we see that it’s working? I’ve got enough numbers.”
Silence.
To be honest, I had heard this sentence before. In steering committees, quarterly reviews, and one-on-one conversations after presentations that had actually gone well. It sounds like disinterest. It sounds like a rejection. It is neither. It is a diagnosis. A mirror held up to us as customer experience professionals. What lies behind it is simpler than you might think: Executives are annoyed. By a flood of data that looks precise and still says nothing. Dashboards that are updated every quarter. NPS scores that move by two points and whose significance no one can confidently explain. Satisfaction curves that reflect sentiment but do not point to a single lever that could be pulled. Trust in CX figures had not disappeared in that room. It had never really been established. I thought about it for a long time to understand what had actually gone wrong that day. The analysis was good. The data was valid. The methodology was sound. The question behind it was the wrong one.
Let’s be clear about one thing: the guiding question of how satisfied our customers are is of course valid. And we had delivered a precise answer to it. What we had not delivered, and what the CMO was demanding at that moment, was the answer to a different question: Which specific experiences along this journey create value, and which ones cost it? So it comes down to the difference between a sentiment report (opinions and experiences, precisely measured) and a management tool. Slide show versus decision trigger, if you will. Over the following days, we went back into the data. This time deeper, with more context. Looking for connections, to finally answer the actual question: Which interactions along the customer journey create value, spark enthusiasm, set us apart? And which moments simply cost money, or even customers?
What we found there changed more than all the slides we could have shown.
The next episode covers what we learned and how we made those insights visible.